BrandWiseDocs
Metrics

Relevance — How Well Brand Mentions Match User Intent

The Relevance metric in BrandWise: measuring how well a brand mention matches the user's query. Formula, components: eligibility, fit to intent, fit to constraints, justification quality.

What Relevance Measures

Relevance measures how well a brand mention matches the user's query and dialog context. A high score means the model mentions the brand appropriately — in response to a fitting query, accounting for constraints, and with quality justification.

This is a critically important metric: even if the brand is frequently mentioned (Visibility is high), irrelevant mentions bring no value and can harm brand perception.

Components of Relevance

Eligibility — Qualification Check

Determines whether the brand fits the query at all:

ValueDescription
EligibleBrand fits the query — category, geography, and features match
UnclearAmbiguous — can't be determined definitively
Not EligibleBrand doesn't fit (e.g., query is about a different category)

If the brand is Not Eligible, the Relevance metric is marked as not applicable (N/A) — it is not calculated or included in the Overall Score.

Fit to Intent (0–2)

How well the brand mention answers the user's question:

ScoreDescription
2Full match — brand recommended specifically for the task in the query
1Partial — brand is related to the topic but doesn't precisely answer the question
0No match — mention is unrelated to the user's intent

Fit to Constraints (0–2)

Whether constraints specified in the query are respected (budget, region, technical requirements):

ScoreDescription
2All constraints met — brand matches budget, geography, and requirements
1Some constraints met
0Constraints ignored or brand doesn't meet them

Justification Quality (0–1)

How convincingly the model explains why the brand fits:

ScoreDescription
1Quality justification — specific reasons, arguments, facts
0No justification — brand simply named without explanation

Formula

Relevance = 40 × (Fit to Intent / 2) + 40 × (Fit to Constraints / 2) + 20 × (Justification Quality / 1)

Maximum score: 40 + 40 + 20 = 100. Each component contributes a weighted percentage: intent match and constraints are the most important (40% each), while justification quality adds 20%.

Note: if the brand is Not Eligible, the metric is marked as not applicable — Relevance is not calculated.

Examples

Relevance = 100 — Perfect Relevance

Brand fits (Eligible), precisely matches query (Fit to Intent = 2), all constraints met (Fit to Constraints = 2), quality justification (Justification Quality = 1):

Relevance = 40 × (2/2) + 40 × (2/2) + 20 × (1/1) = 40 + 40 + 20 = 100

Relevance = 60 — Moderate Relevance

Brand fits (Eligible), partial query match (Fit to Intent = 1), constraints met (Fit to Constraints = 2), no justification (Justification Quality = 0):

Relevance = 40 × (1/2) + 40 × (2/2) + 20 × (0/1) = 20 + 40 + 0 = 60

Relevance = 0 — Brand Doesn't Fit

Brand doesn't fit the query (Not Eligible) — Relevance is not applicable (N/A).

Dialog analysis panel — Relevance section

Why Relevance Matters More Than Visibility

High visibility without relevance is noise. If the model mentions your brand in response to an irrelevant query, the user will either ignore the recommendation or have a negative experience.

The ideal combination is high scores in both Visibility and Relevance: the brand is prominent and mentioned appropriately.

Use Positioning Match to evaluate what exactly the model says about the brand, and Usefulness to assess the practical value of the recommendation.

Start evaluating relevance

On this page