BrandWiseDocs
Metrics

Consideration — Does Your Brand Make the AI Shortlist?

The Consideration metric in BrandWise: whether your brand makes the recommendation shortlist in ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Formula, shortlist presence, comparative advantage, examples.

What Consideration Measures

Consideration measures whether the brand makes it into the recommendation shortlist for the user. The metric evaluates not just inclusion in recommendations, but the quality of presentation — how thoroughly competitive advantages are described and whether limitations are disclosed.

Consideration bridges visibility and real impact: if Visibility shows the brand is prominent, Consideration shows whether that visibility converts into a recommendation.

When It Applies

Consideration is calculated only for organic context (Query Context = Organic) — when the user didn't mention the brand in their query.

For Brand Prompted and Unclear contexts, the metric is not applicable (N/A).

Components of Consideration

Shortlist Presence (60% weight)

How the brand is represented in the recommendation list:

ValueScoreDescription
Recommended First1.0Recommended as the best option — clear priority
Listed with Reason0.75Listed with justification — explanation of why to consider
Listed without Reason0.15Listed without explanation — simply enumerated among options
Not Listed0.0Not included in the recommendation list

Comparative Advantage (0–2)

How clearly the brand's advantages over alternatives are highlighted:

ScoreDescription
2Clear advantages — direct comparison with competitors, unique properties highlighted
1Partial — differences mentioned without direct comparison
0None — brand listed without highlighting advantages

Risk Disclosure (0–1)

Whether limitations, nuances, or scenarios where the brand may not fit are disclosed:

ScoreDescription
1Limitations noted — honest presentation increases recommendation credibility
0No caveats — only positives

As with Usefulness, disclosing limitations increases the score — an honest recommendation is worth more than unconditional praise.

Formula

detail_score = (comparative_advantage + risk_disclosure) / 3

Consideration = 100 × (0.6 × presence + 0.4 × detail_score)

Shortlist presence carries more weight (60%), but without quality advantage description (40%), a high score is unattainable.

Examples

Consideration = 87 — Strong Recommendation

Recommended first (Recommended First = 1.0), clear advantages (comparative_advantage = 2), no limitations (risk_disclosure = 0):

detail_score = (2 + 0) / 3 = 0.67
Consideration = 100 × (0.6 × 1.0 + 0.4 × 0.67) = 100 × 0.87 = 87

Consideration = 72 — Listed with Justification

Listed with explanation (Listed with Reason = 0.75), partial advantages (comparative_advantage = 1), limitations noted (risk_disclosure = 1):

detail_score = (1 + 1) / 3 = 0.67
Consideration = 100 × (0.6 × 0.75 + 0.4 × 0.67) = 100 × 0.72 = 72

Consideration = 9 — Weak Inclusion

Listed without explanation (Listed without Reason = 0.15), no advantages (comparative_advantage = 0), no limitations (risk_disclosure = 0):

detail_score = (0 + 0) / 3 = 0
Consideration = 100 × (0.6 × 0.15 + 0.4 × 0) = 100 × 0.09 = 9

Dialog analysis panel — Consideration section

Consideration vs Visibility vs Top of Mind

Three metrics describe different aspects of competitive position:

MetricQuestionFocus
VisibilityHow prominent is the brand?Position and detail of the mention
Top of MindWho does the model recall first?Order relative to competitors
ConsiderationDoes the brand make the shortlist?Quality of inclusion in recommendations

The ideal scenario is high scores across all three: the brand is prominent, mentioned first, and recommended with quality justification.

Start monitoring Consideration

On this page